No results found – not my idea of good experience.

In my last blog I talked about making the most from your online presence – which can be cost effective and delivery high yields. As promised this is the first in a series of posts about best practices for recruitment agency websites.

We review and support agencies across the UK of various sizes – some have thousands of jobs on their systems others have tens of jobs. Too frequently small companies with 30 to 100 jobs are sold a complex website offering their users detailed search options such as category, salary, location, hours and keyword search. Great isn’t it? Such a web site gives the user true search power to find what they are lookingfor- umm, in a word - NO!

The problem is the technology supplier is selling what appeals – the features and functionality of the big boys. To most small SME agencies this will look and sound the best thing possible – and in favour of the supplier probably the more expensive option.

The problem is no one is considering the user – the online jobseeker.

The key word that is missed is EXPERIENCE! What is the experience when I come across all these options?

Well I might fill in salary,location and some keywords and click search with a keen eagerness to find my next perfect job. Unfortunately more often than the user is faced with a page saying – “No results found”. This is a very poor experience and will probably end up with the user leaving the agency website for good!

Job seeking is highly pragmatic – the job seeker changes their expectation and ideal job throughout their job-seeking journey. Typically the search widens the longer they are seeking.

The online job search should provide the ability to get to the jobs that may be of interest quicklyand easily. Jobs should be returned when ever possible, there will be no application if no job advert is read.

The search complexity has to reflect the choice provided by the data. This is key to a positive user experience.

So the best practice rule 1:

“Only provide search options that will typically return jobs from the choice of jobs available – if all the jobs are in London then don’t ask the user to choose between London and Edinburgh”

This may seem obvious– but go and have a look at your site and your competitors sites – how hard isit to actually get the search to return jobs? You may be shocked!

Next time post–Browsing not searching and helping Google read your jobs

 

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Related posts

Comments

October 22. 2008 11:20

Ivan | JobsBlog.ie

Hi Dave,

1.Nice BlogEngine Theme!

2. User experience on the jobs sites is ... poor. You are 100% right. Witha ll the AJAX, predictive imput, and all modern Web X.0 funky things, it is still poor. Smile

Someone should do something about it. It has been poor for a long time. I hoped LinkedIN will bring something new,... but nothing really excitting so far from them as well.

If you write a good post on how should a nev job board function, I prommise I will build it! Smile

I started the design at: http://www.jobsboard.ie - comments are wellcome!

Ivan | JobsBlog.ie

October 23. 2008 11:53

Mark Hobson

Glad to find someone else who has a bug bear about poor candidate experience- I thought I was perhaps turning into a grumpy old bloke! Too many people get fixated on bells and whistles and forget about the reason they wanted technology in the first place- its the same with ATS as with job boards and recruitment portals.

Mark Hobson

Comments are closed